<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ONEOK Field Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moderntulsa.net/2009/03/26/oneok-field/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moderntulsa.net/2009/03/26/oneok-field/</link>
	<description>promote, preserve and explore modern architecture in the tulsa oklahoma area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:53:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: c rad</title>
		<link>http://www.moderntulsa.net/2009/03/26/oneok-field/comment-page-1/#comment-22372</link>
		<dc:creator>c rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moderntulsa.net/?p=582#comment-22372</guid>
		<description>hard to trust the design people when the outfield doesn&#039;t look exactly the same in all of the renderings. don&#039;t know what I mean? go to http://oneokfield.com/media-gallery and look at the renderings. The place where the fence juts out is in left-center field in some of them and in right-center field in the other ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hard to trust the design people when the outfield doesn&#8217;t look exactly the same in all of the renderings. don&#8217;t know what I mean? go to <a href="http://oneokfield.com/media-gallery" rel="nofollow">http://oneokfield.com/media-gallery</a> and look at the renderings. The place where the fence juts out is in left-center field in some of them and in right-center field in the other ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason P.</title>
		<link>http://www.moderntulsa.net/2009/03/26/oneok-field/comment-page-1/#comment-18652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moderntulsa.net/?p=582#comment-18652</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s borderline criminal what they are doing to the property taxes down there. There are companies down there, due to the nature of their business, that will see zero benefit from this new ball park and yet their property taxes are going up $2500 per year??? Absolutely unacceptable.

Oh, and has anybody else noticed the stack of free Drillers tickets my the register at QT and half the other places in town? Yeah... The stands are still empty. 

Man, this IS a great idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s borderline criminal what they are doing to the property taxes down there. There are companies down there, due to the nature of their business, that will see zero benefit from this new ball park and yet their property taxes are going up $2500 per year??? Absolutely unacceptable.</p>
<p>Oh, and has anybody else noticed the stack of free Drillers tickets my the register at QT and half the other places in town? Yeah&#8230; The stands are still empty. </p>
<p>Man, this IS a great idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.moderntulsa.net/2009/03/26/oneok-field/comment-page-1/#comment-14195</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moderntulsa.net/?p=582#comment-14195</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why the ballpark faces the Southeast?  Any guesses?  I would think a better backdrop would be to face the downtown buildings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the ballpark faces the Southeast?  Any guesses?  I would think a better backdrop would be to face the downtown buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRB</title>
		<link>http://www.moderntulsa.net/2009/03/26/oneok-field/comment-page-1/#comment-13244</link>
		<dc:creator>JRB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moderntulsa.net/?p=582#comment-13244</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s the verdict? Prefer this over the previous design treatment?

I&#039;ll go first: 

No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s the verdict? Prefer this over the previous design treatment?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go first: </p>
<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane hood</title>
		<link>http://www.moderntulsa.net/2009/03/26/oneok-field/comment-page-1/#comment-12401</link>
		<dc:creator>shane hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moderntulsa.net/?p=582#comment-12401</guid>
		<description>i am relieved that there is not too much &quot;Art Deco&quot; applied decoration on the building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am relieved that there is not too much &#8220;Art Deco&#8221; applied decoration on the building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waylin Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.moderntulsa.net/2009/03/26/oneok-field/comment-page-1/#comment-12114</link>
		<dc:creator>Waylin Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moderntulsa.net/?p=582#comment-12114</guid>
		<description>there is a good discussion concerning this on the TulsaNow forums</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a good discussion concerning this on the TulsaNow forums</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.583 seconds -->

